User talk:Rahuldevnow
August 2021
[edit]
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. [1] MrOllie (talk) 15:16, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
- Hi Millie, the page was broken. There are many links that are broken, can you be specific where there was an intention of adding promotional link? Rahuldevnow (talk) 15:47, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
- That a link is dead is not a reason to replace it with an unreliable spam link. MrOllie (talk) 15:48, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
- What deems it as a spamy link? Rahuldevnow (talk) 15:51, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
- Still awaiting your reply Ollie, You seem to be behaving as a custodian. Appreciate your volunteering but it does not give you the right to call me a spammer and mark me as one. This is bullying. I guess you need to be called what you are!!! Rahuldevnow (talk) 16:01, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
- Replacing reliable sources with spammy blog sites is classic spamming behavior. You've had your warning - keep it up and you can expect that your account will be blocked and/or the URL blacklisted. MrOllie (talk) 16:06, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
- Now you are threatening me, it's on on record. How does it make a spammy link? You still owe me an explanation Rahuldevnow (talk) 16:10, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
- Replacing reliable sources with spammy blog sites is classic spamming behavior. You've had your warning - keep it up and you can expect that your account will be blocked and/or the URL blacklisted. MrOllie (talk) 16:06, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
- Still awaiting your reply Ollie, You seem to be behaving as a custodian. Appreciate your volunteering but it does not give you the right to call me a spammer and mark me as one. This is bullying. I guess you need to be called what you are!!! Rahuldevnow (talk) 16:01, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
- What deems it as a spamy link? Rahuldevnow (talk) 15:51, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
- That a link is dead is not a reason to replace it with an unreliable spam link. MrOllie (talk) 15:48, 22 August 2021 (UTC)