Jump to content

User talk:Raj the one

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

==Welcome!== hi Raj Sir , plz help me other person create my wekipedia page is SADH orhan. my Original name is Surendra Sharma Orhaan and screen name SS Orhaan.i want wikipedia page SS Orhaan .Plz help me

September 2017[edit]

The Wikipedia community has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or a topic ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups.

SpacemanSpiff 07:50, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Your repeated posts on wiki mafia etc make it clear that you are not here to contribute to an encyclopaedia. As such, if this behavior continues then your editing privileges will be revoked. —SpacemanSpiff 08:46, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
So how should i address the people, who does not contribute to the article but are quick to delete the content added. You can look at my history to be better aware of my effort to edit content which i know. Now if my opinion hurts someone personally that is something wikipedian should think more why someone will say something like this, why rules are so hard to edit any article, i am perfectly fine to add my suggestions and requests in talk page as well, as they are also getting recorded somewhere. if you think i should not use wiki mafia, how to describe those, who does not contribute to the article but delete in the name of not-good-enough-reliable source and does not edit old unreliable source info, as it suits to the preference of individuals. Please suggest your opinion and how to improve overall situation. gostanwik 08:54, 5 September 2017 (UTC)