User talk:RedFaction17

February 2024

Hello, I'm Fanfanboy. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Lufthansa Flight 649 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Fanfanboy (talk) 22:47, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not only were my changes constructive but they were necessary to reflect the objective truth of the events. RedFaction17 (talk) 22:50, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lufthansa Flight 649. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Shaws username (talk) 22:50, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to insert fringe or undue weight content into articles, as you did at Lufthansa Flight 649, you may be blocked from editing. Articles on Wikipedia do not give fringe material equal weight to majority viewpoints; content in articles are given representation in proportion to their prominence. Info-Screen::Talk 01:17, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was a correct edit though RedFaction17 (talk) 01:21, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't about right or wrong; its about a Neutral Point of View. Removing most references of the term hijackers from that article introduces a bias on the judgement of the action. --Info-Screen::Talk 01:28, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

smh, cringe 🤮 RedFaction17 (talk) 14:40, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:98C5:A273:98F2:4560 (talk) 23:00, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]