User talk:Renamed user g1luxev6mk

I have cleared my own talk page for privacy reasons. This is not intended to hide information on past bans. For information on my past offenses on Wikipedia, use "View History".

Thank you

Ty

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Leugen9001. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sexual ethics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Woman Taken in Adultery (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Complementarianism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Piper (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reassurance

Anyone who say that you were intentionally trying to make the situation worse is an idiot, and they better not make that claim where I can see it. We do have rules about that (WP:AGF)

You are doing fine. Nobody expects a new user to know all of our many policies. --Guy Macon (talk) 22:23, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say they were right to suggest investigating whether or not it's good faith because I have committed severe vandalism in the past. I agree with you, however, that to outright state that I was intentionally trying to make the situation worse without evidence is incorrect. Leugen9001 (talk) 22:25, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, looks good-faith to me, as I said on my own talk page. However, you might want to update your RfArb request statement to strike or remove the bit about Guy Macon's claim being hearsay; he's provided evidenciary diffs already. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 16:18, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't aware of the pressure you were under at User talk:Fæ about this; you're being manipulated by a particular party in the dispute to make everyone else look like they have nothing but "hearsay". — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 08:03, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

To be clear, when I write something like "User X said (direct quote). I have not personally confirmed claim A or claim B, but I can confirm claim C (link to evidence)" That is NOT hearsay.

Hearsay would be if I said claim A or B as were true or that I know them to be false -- without personally examining the evidence and posting a link to it.

As our article on Hearsay says, "Hearsay evidence is 'an out-of-court statement offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted therein.' " and "if Susan is unavailable for cross-examination, the answer is hearsay. A justification for the objection is that the person who made the statement is not in court and thus is insulated from cross-examination. Note, however, that if the attorney asking the same question is not trying to prove the truth of the assertion about Tom being in town but the fact that Susan said the specific words, it may be acceptable."

I directly quoted SMcCandlish. The words I quoted are on the Arbcom page. SMcCandlish is available to answer questions about his statement. I was quite clear on which part of the quote that I can personally confirm to be true and which parts I have not confirmed either way.

I am extremely familiar with Wikipedia's rules, and in fact had a major hand in creating some of them. I don't make rookie mistakes like posting hearsay on Arbcom evidence pages.

(You, Leugen9001, are a "rookie" and nobody expects you to be perfect. Everyone involved agrees that you have good motives, and any minor mistakes you may have made are easily corrected.) --Guy Macon (talk) 17:52, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for self-reverting

I'm at talk discussing why I think this section was a problem if you would like to discuss further. Simonm223 (talk) 19:06, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

RFAR declined

Your request for arbitration has been declined. For the Arbitration Committee, Miniapolis 18:15, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]