Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LittlePuppers was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Hello, Reredos!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! LittlePuppers (talk) 00:04, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToadetteEdit was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Thank you for reviewing my submission. I'm a little confused with the reason given, however.
My article has citations to seven different sources ranging from the Dictionary of Canadian Biography to local newspapers to the Biographical Dictionary of Architects in Canada. These are all in-depth, reliable, secondary and independent sources that discuss the historical and cultural significance of the building's architect and the artist who created its mural. Existing Wikipedia articles recognize the architect's and artist's value to Canadian history and creative culture. The addition of this article would expand Wikipedia's existing body of knowledge with respect to these two individuals.
Given Trinity Anglican Church's connection to the history of Cape Breton, Nova Scotia, and its connection to Robert Harris, a famous Canadian painter, and the architect William Critchlow Harris, I would ask that you reconsider your decision to accept my submission. Trinity Anglican Church is as historically, architecturally and artistically significant as the three buildings I cite above, if not more so. It seems strange it would be denied an entry of its own.
If you have specific suggestions about how to improve my submission, I would, of course, be happy to incorporate them into it. At the moment, I'm not sure what to do and am very confused because it seems Wikipedia entries for other Nova Scotia churches have been approved with far fewer sources than the one I submitted.
