User talk:Rfwh

Nice work!

		The WikiCookie
		You've learned how to use basic wikicode in your sandbox. You can always return there to experiment more.

Posted automatically via sandbox guided tour. Rfwh (talk) 17:16, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Movie

Hey friend, want to catch a movie? Galanyousuf1 (talk) 17:51, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Rfwh, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help.

I work with the Wiki Education Foundation, and help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment. If there's anything I can do to help with your assignment (or, for that matter, any other aspect of Wikipedia) please feel free to drop me a note. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:44, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A Little Review From a Classmate from CHM437

Hi! It's just a little bit of general comments from me on your draft Wiki article in your Sandbox.

1) The title of the section "protein": this section seems to be more about the "discovery" of eosinophile peroxidase in vivo. Also, watch out for opinion-loaded words such as "golden age (of cytology..)."

2) Under the section "genes", the content seems to be mostly talking about information about the protein.

3) A possible concern: Be careful if you are going to present data (i.e. "circular dichroism data"), especially if it is from one primary source (secondary source what has compiled data should be no problem).

You are still in the process of working hard on your article. My suggestions are just for reference! Cheers!

Wilzzw (talk) 06:36, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Active site of eosinophil peroxidase.gif

Thanks for uploading File:Active site of eosinophil peroxidase.gif. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:05, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Eosinophil peroxidase - Demonstration of protoporphyrin linkage.gif

Thanks for uploading File:Eosinophil peroxidase - Demonstration of protoporphyrin linkage.gif. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:05, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Eosinophil peroxidase draft

Your draft article looks good. I made a few minor edits to it. One thing you might want to think about is the age of the some of the references - anything from 10 or 25 years ago has a good chance of being out of date. That isn't a problem for all information, of course, but Wikipedia prefers recent sources, especially review articles, rather than citing the first person who made the discoveries (as is more the case in academic writing). Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:46, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Rfwh. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]