User talk:Richardexplosion

Notability of Indian Givers

A tag has been placed on Indian Givers, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Realkyhick 07:11, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not recreate deleted pages, and certainly do not recreate deleted pages so that they have no meaningful content. J Milburn 17:14, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to User:Sasquatch. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --TeaDrinker 18:02, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. Vsmith 03:20, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]