User talk:Ricmagno

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Ricmagno. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Ricmagno~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

02:41, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Productivity Function

Hello, Ricmagno. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Productivity Function".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 03:19, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Citing your own research / conflict of interest

Hello Ricmagno, while contributions from topic experts are greatly appreciated, Wikipedia is no venue to popularize specific academics or their publications. Almost all of your major edits consist of adding publications from a small group of authors (in almost all cases with only minor or tangential details, and no substantial topic-related information). If you are one of these authors, you have a conflict of interest and should disclose this transparently. In this case, please make sure to read WP:COI, WP:SELFCITE and WP:CITESPAM, and suggest further additions involving these publications on the article talkpages instead of adding them yourself - I have reverted most additions of these references without substantial encyclopedic content. Also a quick additional point: information in the lead paragraph usually does not need references anyway and should always be elaborated in more detail in the main text (see MOS:LEAD). If you have further questions, please feel free to ask me or post at WP:Teahouse for Wikipedia-related questions. Thank you for your consideration. GermanJoe (talk) 10:15, 30 July 2018 (UTC)