User talk:Rita Mordio

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 2012[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rita Mordio (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I'm sorry if I have violated any policy, but I really do not quite see what it is I've done wrong. My edits have been, or have been intended to be, civil and constructive, and I apologise if they have not been. It seems to have been established now that I am not, as alleged, a sockpuppet of a banned user, and so I don't quite understand the rationale for blocking me. However, I don't mind agreeing not to do it again if only I knew what it was I did wrong in the first place! Rita Mordio (talk) 18:41, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It does appear to be established that you are a sockpuppet of a banned user. You'll need to offer a more compelling rebuttal to the findings of the checkuser and the material presented below. Kuru (talk) 14:10, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • Checkuser Tnxman307 did not rule out Rita Mordio as a sockpuppet. But this edit by an ipsock within the usual iprange of Echigo mole[1] and the subsequent identical edit by Rita Mordio [2] as the first edit since 2009 can only be sockpuppetry. Mathsci (talk) 02:46, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]