User talk:Rjs55 85
Welcome
[edit]Welcome!
Hello, Rjs55 85, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!
Aboutmovies (talk) 05:10, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
Sourcing for football infobox parameters
[edit]Hi,
since you seem to be a new contributor, I thought I should give you a heads up about some stuff regarding league season articles, especially for the infoboxes.
First of all, anything that is not already sourced in the article itself, such as "longest winning/losing" streaks, attendance records or any match dates, must be referenced. The reference itself should be from a reliable source and directly mention the fact being sourced. If this is not the case, the content in question may be removed as original research, which is not allowed at Wikipedia, at any time.
In other words: If team xyz has won eight matches in a row, you need to cite a source where exactly this is stated; the fact must be verifiable. If the match with the highest number of goals takes place on 5 June 2010 (note that there are no trailing zeros in the date format), we need a page (ideally a match report) with the date. It is not sufficient if you just put a link to a general page (e.g. Soccerway) or another kind of statistical overview page, as this makes verification difficult, if not impossible.
Another, albeit minor, thing is that flags for any players should not be included in infoboxes, for two reasons. Besides eating up much-needed space, the flags hinder information accessibility as they distract the human eye from a otherwise text-only box. The only exception for that rule is for supernational championships of any kind.
Finally, there are two preferenced formats for the goalscorers lists, this one and this one. Both have their advantages. If you prefer easy editability, I'd recommend the list format; however, if you like a clean layout better, use the table format. When using the table format, please note that the "goals" column should not be formatted like the "rank" column; in other words, avoid any kind of "rowspans" for the goals. In any case, each goalscorers/assistants list should contain the best ten players plus those level with the tenth-best player (if there are not too many of them, of course).
I hope this helps. Nevertheless, if you still have a question, either read the first section of the season article task force talk page or just drop a line to one of the veterans in here (e.g. SonjiCeli (talk · contribs), PeeJay2K3 (talk · contribs) or myself, just to name a few). Lastly, thank you for contributing, you are doing edits that are much needed and appreciated! :-) Cheers, Soccer-holicI hear voices in my head... 12:33, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Rjs55 85. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)