User talk:Roback33

Your submission at Articles for creation: Royal Blues Taipei FC (May 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikiisawesome was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Royal Blues Taipei FC and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

/wia /talk 21:30, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Roback33, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! /wia /talk 21:30, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Royal Blues Taipei FC (June 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mahensingha was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Royal Blues Taipei FC and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MahenSingha (Talk) 16:03, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Royal Blues Taipei FC concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Royal Blues Taipei FC, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Royal Blues Taipei FC

Hello, Roback33. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Royal Blues Taipei FC".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 02:10, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Robert Iwanicki

The article Robert Iwanicki has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a football manager who fails WP:GNG and who has not managed a club in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 13:19, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Robert Iwanicki

Can you support your claim that the Intercity Football League is fully pro with reliable sources? Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:43, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well, for starters, there is no Intercity Football League anymore, this season the league was renamed to Taiwan Football Premier League, which is a first step in the following article ^[1] We have an annual budged of 2-3 Million NT$ (800000 of it subsidized by government) and EACH player has a valid contract with the club (I can send you a copy of it and you can request a copy at the Association), half of out players play and work as coaches in our club. Let me me know how to prove it to you. Best regards

All that source show is that the league is planned to be professional in future; what is needed is a source that show that it's fully pro now. Many leagues have professionalism standards as part of their licensing or player registration rules. If this is the case in Taiwan, then post the rules (with translations of the relevant sections if they're not in English) to WT:FPL for discussion. If not, your best bet will be to find secondary sources that discuss the league from a business perspective, specifically about player's salaries.

There's one other thing I should mention. The way you say "we" leads me to think that you might work for or are otherwise associated with the league or one of it's clubs. If this is the case, it means you have a conflict of interest. Be sure to read Wikipedia guidelines on conflict of interest and be very careful editing articles related to that conflict. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:01, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

^ "Taipei Time article". {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |1= (help)

[1] "Taipei Time article". {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |1= (help)

[1]