User talk:Roboticsexp

July 2020

Hello, I'm MrOllie. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. [1] MrOllie (talk) 11:30, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Hello MrOllie, Thanks for your Feedback. Can you please give me more details on what exactly appeared too promotional? I think the article is missing the manufacturer independent approach and when looking at the ongoing digitalization process And the lack of professional Expertise such solutions will more and more play an Important role And it is important to mention them as Options which are already in use. Thanks again and kind regards

Hello MrOllie, would be great to receive more information about the topic.

Thanks a lot, kind regards Roboticsexp (talk) 14:46, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

First, I'd like to ask: are you related to or employed by artiminds in some fashion? - MrOllie (talk) 12:20, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

hi MrOllie, I am working in the automation industry and know artiminds or better their solutions from customers and partners I am working with. But if the only problem is, that the company name should not be mentioned than that´s fine for me. I absolutaly understand. I just saw, that RobotDK referenced to their website when talking about offline programming and wanted to reference to detailed information about the manufacturer independent approach. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roboticsexp (talk • contribs)

Generally speaking, all content should summarize secondary sources (newspapers, review articles) rather than primary sources (such as vendor websites) - MrOllie (talk) 11:31, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Ok, I understand. Roboticsexp (talk) 09:56, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

January 2024

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 15:49, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi @MrOllie, Thanks for your feedback. So would it be ok, to add the additional note in the text without any link? That´s just fine for me. If so, I would do that.

Kind regards Roboticsexp (talk) 14:33, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

No. Advertising as you have been doing isn't acceptable, with or without a link. MrOllie (talk) 14:43, 8 February 2024 (UTC)