Jump to content

User talk:Robsmommy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

My son Rob claims he is helping here. Trouble is he will not show us :o|. So I am here too now Rob honey watch your step young man. I will anyalyze you soon enough. MomRobsmommy 19:09, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Son - I just left a message. I hope this is going to be funny and not frightening! Mom.Robsmommy 19:09, 3 January 2006 (UTC)I just realized I did not do the proper form and forgot to sign.Robsmommy 19:09, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your son is located right ....

[edit]

YOU FAIL ITNonoffensive 22:40, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

...here. Glad you joined wikipedia, ma'am. Have fun editting. :) -MegamanZero|Talk 23:08, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Er, let's clear this matter up, shall we? My mother doesn't use Wikipedia, and she doesn't edit it. There's more than one "Rob" on the internet, and clearly we're not affiliated. Rob Church Talk 15:13, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
My mistake. I only know one Rob (you), so I made an (incorrent) assumption. Please, I ask forgiveness from you both. -MegamanZero|Talk 15:15, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've found another Rob. His user name is Baldghoti. I can't make any promises, though. With 752,658 registered users, more than a couple of them are bound to be named Rob. --TantalumTelluride 00:14, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

looks like others have already responded to your inquiry. I have removed it from Talk:Wikipedia; it would be more properly placed on the Wikipedia:Village pump. For the record, the inquiry was:

My son Rob is usually on our computer late at night and claims to be senior in Wikipedia. He is wiping out the History Files but is there a way I could find out anonymously whether he in fact IS 'editing'? Robsmommy 19:06, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Theoretically, we can find this information in the server logs if both of you are editing from the same Internet connection, but we probably wouldn't bother in a case like this.--Eloquence* 18:06, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think it would set a bad precedent and would be an invasion of privacy. Also (without affecting the previous statements), this whole robsmommy thing may well be a hoax. --kingboyk 17:41, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]