User talk:Rochus in rice

Welcome

Hello, Rochus in rice, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! KillerChihuahua^?!?Advice 21:24, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to As a Peace-Loving Global Citizen. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Please read WP:NPOV and do not use Unification Church promotional pieces as sources for articles. KillerChihuahua^?!?Advice 22:11, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Robert Parry. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. KillerChihuahua^?!?Advice 22:32, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to As a Peace-Loving Global Citizen, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Robert Parry is a living person, and any negative content must meet stringent sourcing standards. Your personal opinion is irrelevant; and your disruptive edit warring to add negative content about him is unacceptable. KillerChihuahua^?!?Advice 00:34, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rochus, you are just creating a ruckus. Please don't ignore these warnings about edit warring. This is an encyclopedia with specific standards and rules. If you don't understand the rules ask someone. --Uncle Ed (talk) 03:15, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 01:14, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to As a Peace-Loving Global Citizen. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Page blanking is vandalism, whether in whole or in part. I suggest you cease your tendentious attempt to whitewash this article. Your personal opinion about the source is irrelevant. KillerChihuahua^?!?Advice 19:51, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive and tendentious editing. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{|unblock| Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 (talk) 20:20, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{{|unblock|I was blocked for edit warring because I was trying to remove a biased book review done by a person who had not read the book and only had negative things to say. This book review was from a man who is a known critic of the content and it was putting undue weight towards a negative point of view, with added fringe which has no factual base, as well as defaming towards a living man and a religion. That article was eventually removed for these reasons. I was only trying to follow the rules, I realize now that I did it the wrong way, I will not edit war in the future. You can see everything that happened by reading the talk page here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:As_a_Peace-Loving_Global_Citizen thank you.}}