User talk:Rohinikumart

Hi

adding name in Telugu for C. Rajagopalachari

I see you have been adding the name of C. Rajagopalachari in Telugu script. In Wikipedia, we add names in native script for the names mostly for native (mother) tongues - the name is in. Since Chakravarthi Rajagopalachari is a Tamil name and he is a Tamil, it is not necessary to add telugu script in the article. I am reverting you for now. If you feel that telugu script is necessary, please discuss it in the Talk page of the article and state your reasons for adding the telugu script.--Sodabottle (talk) 15:28, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding ancient Tamil literary work's mention of Tirupati temple

Can you kindly explain in the talk section of the article why you keep removing the content regarding the mention of Tirupati temple and diety (in very clear terms) in the ancient Tamil work Silapadikaram?Gandharva95 (talk) 12:31, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked for a period of twenty-four hours for edit-warring on Tirumala Venkateswara Temple. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator. For alternative methods to appeal, see Wikipedia:Appealing a block. -- tariqabjotu 08:05, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rohinikumart (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am here for good cause

Decline reason:

I am sure that you are. However, as Wikipedia works on WP:CONSENSUS, edit-warring is never permitted, and passing the 3 revert line is a clear violation. You might wish to read about the bold, revert, discuss cycle which will help you once your block has expired. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:20, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Request for mediation Tirumala Venkateswara Temple

A request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to Tirumala Venkateswara Temple was recently filed. As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. The process of mediation is entirely voluntary and focuses exclusively on the content issues over which there is disagreement. Please review the request page and the guide to mediation requests and then indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you would agree to participate. Discussion relating to the mediation request welcome at the case talk page. Thank you, Sunray (talk) 00:11, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

You have been blocked from editing, for a period of 2 weeks, for abusing IPs to edit war on Tirumala Venkateswara Temple and evading your block. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. T. Canens (talk) 18:13, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Request for mediation of Tirumala Venkateswara Temple

A request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to Tirumala Venkateswara Temple was recently filed. As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. The process of mediation is entirely voluntary and focuses exclusively on the content issues over which there is disagreement. Please review the request page and the guide to mediation requests and then indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you would agree to participate. Discussion relating to the mediation request welcome at the case talk page.

Thank you, AGK 23:57, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Request for mediation rejected

The Request for mediation concerning Tirumala Venkateswara Temple, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. An explanation of why it has not been possible to allow this dispute to proceed to mediation is provided at the mediation request page (which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time). Queries on the rejection of this dispute can be directed to the Committee chairperson or e-mailed to the mediation mailing list.

For the Mediation Committee, AGK 00:05, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
(This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to perform case management.)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rompicherla concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rompicherla, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:00, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rompicherla

Hello Rohinikumart. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Rompicherla".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rompicherla}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 12:02, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]