User talk:Rojin416

References

Please read Wikipedia:Reliable sources before you use references as not everything on the internet is considered reliable references. As "Elewî" means Alevi and not Alevism, I've found a more appropriate term instead. Semsûrî (talk) 10:15, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! But I'm Kurdish and Elewî is the the term we use. One link is from 2009 that states "Elewi Kurds" and the other was an education book, that also mentioned Elewi. It's hard to find reliable sources since Turkey banned the Kurdish language, and only recently allowed us to speak Kurdish. We weren't allowed to use the term Elewi, so it's hard to find other sources. Thank you for updating the page. I'm new and will try to get better at this! Rojin416 (talk) 10:20, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Shahmaran, you may be blocked from editing. HistoryofIran (talk) 19:18, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Shahmaran. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contributions)} 19:19, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. UtherSRG (talk) 13:40, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rojin416 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand why I was blocked. I regret not reading the rules properly. Please unblock me. I would like to continue making contributions to help spread information on my people, culture, and history. Rojin416 (talk) 01:07, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This unblock request never actually states the specific reason why you were blocked. It could apply to almost anyone in any circumstance. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:42, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.