User talk:Ronpaulnation

Welcome

Hello, Ronpaulnation, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! DickClarkMises 16:08, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Rp photo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Rp photo.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:09, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Rp photo.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Rp photo.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Tom (talk - email) 16:48, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ron Paul

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in Ron Paul. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. --Orange Mike 16:01, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your username

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

I hope not to seem unfriendly or make you feel unwelcome, but I noticed your username, and I am concerned that it might not meet Wikipedia's username policy. After you look over that policy, could we discuss that concern here?

I'd appreciate learning your own views, for instance your reasons for wanting this particular name, and what alternative username you might accept that avoids raising this concern.

You have several options freely available to you:

If you can relieve my concern through discussing it here, I can stop worrying about it.
If the two of us can't agree here, we can ask for help through Wikipedia's dispute resolution process, such as requesting comments from other Wikipedians. Wikipedia administrators usually abide by agreements reached through this process.
You can keep your contributions history under a new username. Visit Wikipedia:Changing username and follow the guidelines there.

Thank you. --Orange Mike 16:41, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RPN, I'd add my welcome, as a fellow Ronpaulican (welcome back). You may notice that WP (a real free-market community) has different ideas about what type of edits should stand than most blog comments rolls. As you get used to community norms it will make more sense. But feel free to edit any of our talk pages to ask questions or make suggestions. I'm sure Mike is just being friendly in his own way to welcome you with his boilerplate comments, because even though a .com exists, "Ronpaulnation" (a meme which is now up to 27,000 Google hits) is not a promotional name any more than "Orange Mike" is promotional of "orangemike.ca". Anyway, check out the Ron Paul history here, and click "diff" to look at individual edits that might interest you, to learn what kind of edits are considered improvements and what kind are quickly reverted. John J. Bulten 17:07, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My concern is that "ronpaulnation" is promotional of Paul's candidacy; I'd say the same to anybody using TancredoRocks or DeanForAmerica or AlGoreWon2000 as a username. (And the orangemike.ca guy is a jock in Canada; no connection, believe me.) --Orange Mike 17:11, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]