User talk:Rose888rose

American Plus Bank[edit]

A tag has been placed on American Plus Bank, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of American Plus Bank and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 00:14, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of American Plus Bank[edit]

A tag has been placed on American Plus Bank requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 01:26, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia, because it has been identified as an account used for promotion of a company or group, with a username that implies that this has been done by that company or group. See Wikipedia:Business' FAQ and Wikipedia:Conflict of interest.

This kind of activity is considered spamming and is forbidden by Wikipedia policies. In addition, the use of a username like yours violates our username policy.

You may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below or emailing the administrator who blocked you.

Your reason should include your response to this issue and a new username you wish to adopt that does not violate our username policy (specifically, understand that accounts are for individuals, not companies or groups, and that your username should reflect this). Usernames that have already been taken are listed here. MCB (talk) 01:49, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|It's my first time trying to create a new talk and i'm recklessly paid more attention about the policy. i'm feel sorry for that. I will behave myself to stay neutral .And I hope change my name -- rose888rose.}}

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Unblocked so you can change your username to Rose888rose at Wikipedia:Changing username. I strongly advise you take notice of the conflict of interest guidelines. Sam Korn ^(smoddy) 12:08, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request handled by: Sam Korn ^(smoddy) 12:08, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your new username seems acceptable, however please be aware you will be expected to avoid writing about your organization. What else would you intend to work on if you are unblocked? Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 00:26, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Erm, not true.. They are expected to use caution, but are not forbidden, when dealing with articles related to their organization. This user doesn't need to prove anything else, so please unblock. -- Ned Scott 04:08, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Aplus_bank.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Aplus_bank.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. O sama K^{Reply? on my talk page, please} 17:20, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]