User talk:Rosebudflower

MRM probation sanctions notification[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed, Men's rights movement, is on article probation. A detailed description of the terms of article probation may be found at Talk:Men's rights movement/Article probation. Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages.

The above is a templated message. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is necessarily any problem with your edits. Thank you. -- Bbb23 (talk) 04:56, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Self-revert[edit]

Since I see you have already been warned about the article probation on MR pages, and there is a big box further warning you when you edit the page, I suggest you self-revert. Even if you are not the anon ip(highly doubtful), you are 2RR. Dave Dial (talk) 03:59, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not characterize content disputes as vandalism[edit]

You may wish to read Wikipedia:Most people who disagree with you on content are not vandals; do not use "Rvv" as an edit summary[1][2] when you are edit warring over content. No matter how incredibly correct your preferred content is, and how incredibly wrong their preferred content is, a content dispute does not make the other party a vandal. I advise you to read WP:VANDNOT, a Wikipedia policy page. Remember that Wikipedia is a collaborative effort, and try to work with your fellow editors to achieve consensus. Killer Chihuahua 02:10, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]