User talk:Rosenbourne

Tiffany Claus

Please do not remove article tags until the issues are resolved. ttonyb1 (talk) 01:52, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Tiffany Claus, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:15, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Tiffany Claus. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 04:34, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Tiffany claus.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Tiffany claus.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ttonyb (talk) 05:13, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Mama mia.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Mama mia.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ttonyb (talk) 05:14, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tiffany Claus

The article Tiffany Claus has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG. Career appears to be trivial.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mbinebri ^{talk ←} 22:40, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tiffany Claus

The article Tiffany Claus has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:BLP1E and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 16:46, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tiffany Claus for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tiffany Claus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiffany Claus until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 17:49, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]