User talk:Rowhater

This account has been blocked indefinitely because its owner is suspected of abusively using multiple accounts.

Please see Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets/Rowhater#User:Rowhater for evidence and further information. (Account information: block log · CentralAuth · suspected sockpuppets · confirmed sockpuppets)

Welcome!

Hello, Rowhater, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Kidd Chris have not conformed to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV), and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me my talk page. Again, welcome! Leebo ^T/C 15:39, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kidd Chris[edit]

The content you are adding to the Kidd Chris article is written like a blog entry for a particular date. I've removed it again, please read Wikipedia:Neutral point of view to understand why your opinions should not be part of the article. Leebo ^T/C 16:15, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not replace this blog entry again, or you will be in violation of the three revert rule, which states that you must not revert an article more than 3 times in a 24 hour period. You should discuss this on the talk page of the article rather than constantly replacing it. Do you understand why it's being removed? Leebo ^T/C 17:41, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you continuing to add it without discussion? Leebo ^T/C 17:59, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule . Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

- TexasAndroid (talk) 18:54, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry[edit]

Sockpuppetry case[edit]

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Rowhater for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Nwwaew (Talk Page) (Contribs) (E-mail me) 14:33, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]