User talk:Rsd315

FIXED (i think) - Image tagging for File:AnthonyDRomero 20110321.jpg

I have added the description block.

Image tagging for File:AnthonyDRomero 20110321.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:AnthonyDRomero 20110321.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:06, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FIXED (i think): File source problem with File:SusanNHerman 2011.jpg

I think I have fixed the problem, but not absolutely sure as I am new and had a hard time finding the information. I hope you'll let me know if I am still missing something.

File source problem with File:SusanNHerman 2011.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:SusanNHerman 2011.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:07, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Given the source & the fact that the person is still living, permission to use the image is going to have to come through the WP:OTRS system - and even then it might get challenged as "replaceable fair use" as the person is still alive and it would be very easy to get a free picture thereof. Skier Dude (talk) 19:05, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:AnthonyDRomero 20110321.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:AnthonyDRomero 20110321.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Erick (talk) 21:15, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:01-ACLU Romero-162.jpg

I notice as an upload summary you included this text "Photo by Richard Corman".

Did Mr. Corman grant you the rights to distribute this image? i kan reed (talk) 18:09, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:01-ACLU Romero-162.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:01-ACLU Romero-162.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 18:32, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Using different styles throughout the encyclopedia, as you did in Anthony Romero‎, makes it harder to read. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. "(Generally, this is only included in the caption if the photographer is notable)" Rostz (talk) 18:42, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:ACLU Anthony D Romero.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:ACLU Anthony D Romero.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. i kan reed (talk) 15:35, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't know you represented the ACLU when I tagged this image. Since you edit the ACLU article, that would be pertinant information to include on your user page. Extra scrutiny is usually given to edits where a conflict of interest may exist, and, as a courtesy, declaring any appropriate associations on your user page facilitates that. i kan reed (talk) 20:24, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]