User talk:Rugantino73

This is Rugantino73's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marco Nica (July 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Very poorly referenced and promotional. Also, no evidence of notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marco Nica and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:29, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thank you for the information: Wikipedia is a paid service. The page is correct. It is your comments that do not reflect your own standards. Good life. Rugantino73 (talk) 13:37, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Rugantino73. You came into the live chat earlier but unfortunately no volunteers were around to help you.

You asked:

Hi, we are created the page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Marco_Nica but we have problem with it publication. The page is ok after many changes and is a good Wikipedia page. Can you publish it? Or Wikipedia isn't a free encyclopedia? Is it a paid service like many companies offer? Thanks.

Wikipedia is not a paid service, if anyone has approached you offering paid editing services please be aware this is a SCAM and this is not endorsed by Wikipedia.

Your draft is not suitable for publication at the current time, as it is written like an advert and is poorly sourced.

I believe you have a connection to Marco, as you said "we": please be aware it is mandatory to disclose a conflict of interest if you are connected to Marco.

Thanks, Qcne (talk) 17:11, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rugantino73! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:29, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marco Nica (July 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Hey man im josh were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marco Nica and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hey man im josh (talk) 14:50, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Rugantino73. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Marco Nica, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:45, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, have a nice day and... check yours pages because some of these have a notability problem. Art will be never promotion it is a natural statement. I know Marco Nica as fabtastic artist not as a friend. Deny this page is a crime, but don't warry a day Nica will be published in Wikipedia. 109.118.112.212 (talk) 18:10, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]