User talk:SABMillerWatch

November 2010

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to SABMiller. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. WuhWuzDat 17:51, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on SABMiller. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful, then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. WuhWuzDat 17:54, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, your account has been blocked; you are welcome to create a new account with a username that represents only you. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline. If your username doesn't represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice. Thank you. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:55, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SABMillerWatch (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am only here by my self - I do not work for SABMiller am just an interested person, so why am I blocked this is censorshipSABMillerWatch (talk) 17:58, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your creation of the sockpuppet account SABMW (talk · contribs) severely reduced your chances of getting unblocked. Favonian (talk) 18:13, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please read the above. You're blocked because of your username, but you're welcome to create a new account with a more appropriate userame. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:00, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]