Jump to content

User talk:STBotI/Archive1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

image Doctor of literature umar alisha

[edit]

this is to confirm that i my self has scanned the document. there is no problem of copy right

thanking you if you would like to ask any more questions you are welcome i have tried to upload this document to prove the notability of Kavisekhara Dr Umar Alisha he is a great scholor this document justifies it

regards Pingali 11:32, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]



Blocked

[edit]

I've blocked this bot for the time being as it is malfunctioning. Please fix the warning message it is leaving on the uploader's talk pages. Theresa Knott | The otter sank 22:03, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Malfunction

[edit]

Bot seems to be malfunctioning. See this edit. I had just uploaded a new (rescaled) version of Image:Mýa.jpg, when I got this message. Seems to be a mishandling of special characters. --Pekaje 12:31, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Build in a longer lag...

[edit]

I'm working on correcting images that don't have a standard FUR and are over sized. I upload the re-sized image first and within 3 minuted the 'bot has tagged it while I'm putting the FUR together in the editing window.

I'm not comfortable putting the FUR up first since it will not match between its stated images size and what is resident when the edit is completed. And it would be less that worthwhile to add the FUR, upload, then fix the FUR.

Is it possible for the 'bot to get a longer lag in stead of all but instantly tagging an upload as non-FURed, especially for a overwrite where the FUR has to be added as an edit, not with the upload.

- J Greb 05:50, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I would find a longer lag extremely annoying, as I then can't immediately see if it will eventually come around and tag the image, or I have to do that myself. I don't mind the messages, as I will just hand them over to whoever originally uploaded (if they are still active), but I certainly don't want to be waiting several minutes to find out if I'll be getting a note from the bot as well. I don't think anyone will care if the FUR is technically incorrect for the couple of minutes it takes to rescale it, so just do that first. --Pekaje 16:39, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I have this same problem. I had uploaded a newer, more FUC-compliant version of a book cover, with the intent of immediately adding the rationale since you can't do this at the upload page. The bot and I got into an edit conflict, so I just cut and pasted the FUR over its edit, but now I have a totally superfluous message on my talk page.

We really need to think about making the edit page more like Commons so the FUR can be added along with the upload. Daniel Case 15:20, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Um, how about adding it in the upload summary? Wouldn't help me, though, since I use the external editor script, which really isn't meant for adding a FUR at the same time (it can, but not easily). As for the superfluous message, why not just remove it? I generally remove bot-made comments once the issue has been taken care of. Nobody says they have to stick around, if they bother you. --Pekaje 15:28, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If the upload is to replace an existing image, the upload summary is just a glorified edit summary, it doesn't put the information onto the article page line a fresh upload does. - J Greb 16:55, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image Note

[edit]

I just added a Fair use rationale note in the image section under the Image:Girlfriends-traceeellisross.png in the Girlfriends article if it is acceptable. Ceddy 06 16:34, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

tagging of obviously self-taken images

[edit]

This bot tagged Image:Downtown3ff1.jpg which was uploaded with the comment "Took In My Dads Plan" (sic). This image is nearly obviously copyright by the uploader. It also appears to have been tagged while the uploader was still working on it. I hope you aren't deleting such images arbitrarily. --ssd 16:41, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Get Some Picture

[edit]

I received your message. Thank you for the words but I didn't actually post it. Only to see how it would look like since the picture is way too large. Can you do it? I have been here for a while on Wikipedia but not actually pro at it. Thanks a mil. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs 19:07, 18 October 2007 (UTC)Mc2006[reply]

bad tag

[edit]

Please, put the tag what you put in my talk page in the original uploaders.

Thanks.

PD. Sorry by my bad english.

Image regaurding Rocky island

[edit]

I am the creator of this image so I will add the tag [[User:Mikel-Fikel 82 |# Mikel-Fikel 82 ]] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikel-Fikel 82 (talkcontribs) 22:52, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

--SineBot 22:53, 16 September 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bodoque57 (talkcontribs) 22:22, August 20, 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Paparazzi pic

[edit]

Hi!! This is Starrydust and you informed me that the picture i uploaded was not free use. I've since removed it from the paparazzi game page but i'm not sure on how to remove the picture...could you tell me how? Thanks in advance!!! User:Starrydust 22:11 , 7 October, 2007 —Preceding signed but undated comment was added at 12:12, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo

[edit]

I´m from the Czech Rep. I don´t good speak English. Please don´t delete this picture. This is my picture. This picture not from the Internet this is my work. Please don´t deleting. Thank you. Good bye —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sparta.nek (talkcontribs) 15:16, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


um

[edit]

Why did the bot remove the welcome? See [1] Thanks! Phgao 19:27, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Casey Mitchum picture

[edit]

I've added the Non-Free/ Fair Use Rationale to the "Caseymitchum1997.jpg" picture. Can you please tell me if I did it right and that the picture won't be deleted? It's a screenshot. Dmarex 15:30, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Burning hand.jpg

[edit]

The image I uploaded was a bad cartoon after all. Can you please remove it? Jonghyunchung 21:40, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've acquired non-copyrighted images

[edit]

I asked the Wits University personnels for a non-copyrighted image of the campus and they emailed it to me. The author is aware of Wikipedia and knows the image's purpose and that I would upload it on Wikipedia (giving due credit to the university). How do I tag this picture given the above information?

Samuella99 21:11, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Pa300.gif

[edit]

Could you send me the template for fair use images please - Roadworx —Preceding unsigned comment added by Roadworx (talkcontribs) 14:32, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your bot has marked this image of a postage stamp, scanned from my collection, for deletion in 7 days due to lack of explanation behind non-free content. However, all of the other stamp illustrations from the article Postage Stamp are marked similarly to my own. Please be kind enough to drop me a note at my user page or e-mail me with the requirements for this. I thought to check the scans of the stamps in the article, but they included no rationale. Thank you.--Lyricmac 22:41, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You need a Fair use rationale. See WP:NFURG --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs 01:05, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the rationale when you have a chance, and let me know if this suffices.Thank you--Lyricmac 16:40, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have a question

[edit]

I don't know how to add that tag you were saying about can you please do it for me??? Teacher-Pet 01:05, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So...

[edit]

My image just got tagged, so I added a source, author, description and stuff. will the image get deleted now? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gawanti (talkcontribs) 19:04, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It could get deleted for another reason, but it helps to say what image it is. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 09:07, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sawasdee

[edit]

Sawasdee Krub! Hello, I'm from Thailand.

Is it okay with my uploaded image (image:Thairoyem1.gif)? Now it was reduced in size. If you have any problem about it, please feel free to warn me. Tangmo 19:21, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oi.

[edit]

Your bot be fuckin' up. I've added a picture, done did everything like I was supposed to, then yo bot be fuckin' with my MIND man. ElcomSoft —Preceding unsigned comment added by OracleGD (talkcontribs) 08:37, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You need a rationale - see WP:NFURG. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs 10:56, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mohsen Hashtroodi

[edit]

Could you please wait for a moment until I am finished with my editing before bombarding me with messages? It is highly annoying to be interrupted! Why this haste? --BF 00:42, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
P.S.) Hashtroodi died 31 years ago and all his photographs are by now PD. Please read the copyright statement before issuing messages! --BF 00:44, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

i have taken all the images...i would like to upload them under cc-sa 3.0Nikkul 20:06, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Image:Corsaire -1899 -3.JPG

[edit]

There is no copyright on this image. It was taken in 1863 in the Russian Empire and whomever actually took the photograph is not known. The subject in the image died in 1882.

Works belonging to the former Soviet government or other Soviet legal entities published before January 1st, 1954, are also public domain in Russia, and are thus public domain the United States except under extraordinary circumstances.

--Mrlopez2681 06:16, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Free screenshot

[edit]

Hi, I'm just letting you know that your robot didn't recognize {{Free screenshot}} (with "GPL" parameter) on this edit. Perhaps it detected my first upload of the graphic, where I didn't specify the "GPL" parameter in {{Free screenshot}}, I'm not too sure. Regardless, the bot claimed the image didn't have a license when it did. Anyways, this is just a minor annoyance—no big deal. +mt 22:22, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GFDL-user|

[edit]

The bot does not seem to recognise the above template [2] --Barryob Vigeur de dessus 23:03, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A bit of time...

[edit]

Perhaps this bot should wait a few minutes (say, ten) before tagging uploaded images. I was in the process of adding a rational directly after upload when it tagged my image (Qr.jpg). No harm done of course, I simply noticed the tag when I saved the rational and removed it, however, it would be nice if it gave the uploader a bit of time to add one.

Regards, -Leif902 22:14, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I second that suggestion. +mt 22:51, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's a coin!

[edit]

For crying out loud, all the information is there! just read it! ES Vic 13:01, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

question

[edit]

hello i wanna ask if i uploud afile how i can delete it coz its not working???? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Devil20077 (talkcontribs) 00:01, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Image source problem with Image:Mornington tourist railway station, October 14, 2005.jpg

[edit]

"I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content..."

It states quite clearly on the image summary page that the photo was taken by User:Ozzmosis, ie. me. --ozzmosis 08:52, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jacinta Collins

[edit]

The image Image:Jacintacollins.JPG does too have information about its copyright status. It has been released into the public domain by the copyright holder. What more information do you need? Adam 10:22, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Iranian woman, Qajar period

[edit]

It is highly annoying the get these messages, while I am editing!!! Can't you wait for a moment before I am finished with editing? I wrote this earlier, but apparently for some reason you believe that I must have twenty fingers! Please stop with this practice! --BF 23:33, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE:

[edit]

I gave a rationale for the Image:Yo-gabba-gabba logo.jpg as asked. --Victor (talk) 23:50, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on User talk:Musicspaces, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because User talk:Musicspaces is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting User talk:Musicspaces, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 06:33, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nice, one of my bots talking to the other. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs 19:06, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hello

[edit]

i am a new person here i want to take some direction from you about wikie english, i am a participant at wikie arabic too ...

                                                         thanks

--Osamahw 08:16, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

bad messages

[edit]

This bot seems to generate unnecessary messages - if the licensing is provided manually by copy&paste rather than the dropbox selection. Rather annoying! Tom Ruen 00:31, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Ali Sarmini image

[edit]

Would you please help me out by telling me how do I put change it to fair use rationale ? --Shahinaz 04:22, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AA 1420

[edit]

I posted the source. It is http://www.ntsb.gov/publictn/2001/AAR0102.pdf WhisperToMe 20:33, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This image is doubly in the public domain: a) it is from the Perry-Castañeda Map Collection, University of Texas and b) it is from 1892. I would rather have thanked you sooner than later for letting me uploading this picture. --victor falk 20:43, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded this photo with higher dimensions which is apparently a wiki violation. However, i tried to reupload another version with ideal 300 x 300 dimension but there's something wrong i think. If you can see the file history, the dimension is 300 buy the image, still, big. Please help. BritandBeyonce (talkcontribs) 01:50, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This image, created by the French government in 1937, is in the public domain.--victor falk 05:32, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]