User talk:SURINENIKIRAN

Speedy deletion nomination of Ashtaadasha shakti peetham , bramaraambikaa devi , kurnool dist

Hello SURINENIKIRAN,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ashtaadasha shakti peetham , bramaraambikaa devi , kurnool dist for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TheLongTone (talk) 14:27, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dwadasha jotirlingam , mallikaarjuna swamy , kurnool dist

Hello SURINENIKIRAN,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Dwadasha jotirlingam , mallikaarjuna swamy , kurnool dist for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, [[{{{article}}}]].

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. schetm (talk) 14:37, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Varaaha laxminarasimha swamy

Hello SURINENIKIRAN,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Varaaha laxminarasimha swamy for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, [[{{{article}}}]].

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. schetm (talk) 14:39, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Astadasha shakti peeth

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Astadasha shakti peeth, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.51shaktipeethambaji.org/Legend.aspx.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:41, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Astadasha shakti peeth

Hello SURINENIKIRAN,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Astadasha shakti peeth for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. schetm (talk) 14:42, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mallikaarjuna swamy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mallikaarjuna swamy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. EoRdE6^{(Come Talk to Me!)} 14:57, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dwadasha jotirlingam

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Dwadasha jotirlingam, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.shreehindutemple.net/hinduism/12-jyotirlingas-of-lord-shiv.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:58, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dwadasha jotirlingam for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dwadasha jotirlingam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dwadasha jotirlingam until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tomandjerry211 (talk) 15:00, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bramaraambikaa devi

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Bramaraambikaa devi, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://indianmandirs.blogspot.com/2013/11/astava-dasa-shakti-peetam-goddess.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:01, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bramaraambikaa devi

Hello SURINENIKIRAN,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Bramaraambikaa devi for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TheMagikCow (talk) 15:04, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Uma Maheswara Swamy

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Uma Maheswara Swamy, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://andhratemple.blogspot.in/2011/09/yaganti-umamaheswara-swamy-temple.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:05, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Uma Maheswara Swamy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Uma Maheswara Swamy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://andhratemple.blogspot.in/2011/09/yaganti-umamaheswara-swamy-temple.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. EoRdE6^{(Come Talk to Me!)} 15:05, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

This is your only warning; if you create an inappropriate page again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. TheMagikCow (talk) 15:06, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. EoRdE6^{(Come Talk to Me!)} 15:06, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]