User talk:Sajal12

Speedy deletion nomination of Exa Web

Hello Sajal12,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Exa Web for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Danrok (talk) 15:06, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Corporate logo of Exa Web Solutions, Melbourne, Australia.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Corporate logo of Exa Web Solutions, Melbourne, Australia.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:45, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing the image. The image does not fit the corresponding page, so please go ahead and delete this image, by all means. I've uploaded new PNG image with the requisite size and it fits properly. And this new image is not orphaned and used as the corporate logo of the org, as can be seen in the Wikipedia page. Thank you. Sajal12 (talk) 16:06, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Exa Web Solutions

The article Exa Web Solutions has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no indication od notability. Of the given refs, 1 is not significant, 2-4 are all based on the same press release, 5-8 do not mention the company, 9-12 are directory entries. Google searches not finding anything significant

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 08:43, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Sajal12. You have new messages at Noq's talk page.
Message added 08:14, 23 October 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

noq (talk) 08:14, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Exa Web Solutions for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Exa Web Solutions is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exa Web Solutions until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. noq (talk) 08:17, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Exa web melbourne australia corporate logo.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Exa web melbourne australia corporate logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:19, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]