User talk:Salleyable

February 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Sally ashley, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Staffwaterboy ^{Critique Me} 01:59, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Salley Ashley

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Salley Ashley requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Staffwaterboy ^{Critique Me} 02:05, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Digital artist

It's perfectly normal on Wikipedia for an occupational title to redirect to the occupation itself instead of having a separate article. It doesn't mean anybody thinks that the art is the artist; it means that what you wrote at digital artist is just a dictionary definition of a term, not an encyclopedia article. We're not a dictionary — we don't create entries just to define what a word or phrase means. Bearcat (talk) 22:46, 5 February 2011 (UTC)