User talk:Sallybegood
January 2016
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/2/28/Information.svg/25px-Information.svg.png)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Castell Alun Colts F.C. has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Castell Alun Colts F.C. was changed by Sallybegood (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.966747 on 2016-01-13T20:58:33+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:58, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Castell Alun Colts F.C. with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:03, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Castell Alun Colts F.C.
[edit]Please review Wikipedia's policy on neutral point of view. You can't just post your opinion to articles. Facts need to be supported with reliable, independent sources. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:23, 13 January 2016 (UTC) Find it difficult to accept that you treat often falsly reported newspaper articles as being deemed reliable yet my comments,which I can have verified by people more reliable and honest than such newspapers, are not. To be honest I now find wikipedia therefore an not only potentially unreliable but also biased in not allowing peoples factual experiences. I therefore cannot see why people use wikipedia as a point of factual research. However it would explain why teachers advise pupils not to use wikipedia. To say I am dissapointed at how wikipedia works is an under statement but does now make me realise why I have stayed away from it until now. Whilst I appreciate your remaining neutral is a key element this does not come across and in order to do this a comments page should be added when the main page cannot be. This will give all parties a place to argue out disputes in a controlled manner and let readers decide