User talk:Sandosanjh

Welcome to Wikipedia! Your village-name entries have been relocated to Dosanjh (disambiguation), a new page that prevents confusing readers. Rather than have two topics in one article, the village names are now in a separate article. If you would care to write individual articles about them, you can link to them from the disambiguation page. Regards, Chuckiesdad/Talk/Contribs 04:15, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello Sandosanjh, welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Chuckiesdad/Talk/Contribs 04:15, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see you are working on your new articles! For how to name articles about geographical places, please see WP:PLACE. Happy editing! Chuckiesdad/Talk/Contribs 04:22, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of DOSANJH

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article DOSANJH, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Seems unremarkable. Google doesn't recognize any places in India name "Dosanjh", but does recognize people, so there are possibilities this may be a biased page...

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Zoo Fari 22:22, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Sangha (surname) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. єmarsee • Speak up! 19:44, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Dosanjh, Punjab (India). Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. TheLeft orium 20:37, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sangha clan

The article Sangha clan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Uncited and NN per a glance at gBooks.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MatthewVanitas (talk) 03:02, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]