User talk:Sanskriitti

Sami Korkiakoski moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Sami Korkiakoski, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE🌈 12:19, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022[edit]

Hello Sanskriitti. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Sanskriitti. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Sanskriitti|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. PRAXIDICAE🌈 12:19, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Praxidicae. Thank you for the message. I am not a paid advocate and I am not directly or inderectly compensated. I just want to contribute in this way to those people whose work I like. Sanskriitti (talk) 19:30, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sami Korkiakoski[edit]

Hello, Sanskriitti. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sami Korkiakoski, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sami Korkiakoski[edit]

Hello, Sanskriitti. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Sami Korkiakoski".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 13:07, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sami Korkiakoski (March 29)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I don't think there is anything there that meets the special WP:ARTIST notability guideline; if this is what's being asserted, please specify which of the criteria 1-4 is satisfied, and produce evidence to clearly support this.

As for WP:GNG notability, none of the sources cited contributes towards this, as they are all interviews, exhibition announcements, and other primary sources.

Note: it is pointless 'citing' the home page of an organisation (gallery, university, etc.). A citation should point to a specific resource which supports the claim against which it is cited. Links to home pages or other generic content only serve as external links.

Private personal details such as DOB must be either supported with a citation to a reliable published source, or else removed (see BLP).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sami Korkiakoski and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:39, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sanskriitti! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:39, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]