User talk:Saoussen.kallel

Stop promoting your theory on Dark matter

Your theory has not been published in peer-reviewed journals and there is no evidence that there has been any reception by other researchers in the field. Therefore your theory is not notable and has no place in the Wikipedia article. Please stop. --Wrongfilter (talk) 09:19, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

You find attached two links for published papers and a link for a given talk in KSA about the same theory:

https://www.pulsus.com/scholarly-articles/a-new-solution-for-dark-matter-and-a-better-understanding-of-quantum-mechanics.pdf

https://www.hilarispublisher.com/abstract/the-mystery-of-time-a-new-solution-for-dark-matter-and-a-better-understanding-of-quantum-mechanics-65816.html

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371110928_A_new_geometrical_model_to_solve_the_puzzle_of_time_and_understand_the_mystery_of_Dark_matter_and_the_magic_of_Quantum_mechanics#fullTextFileContent Saoussen.kallel (talk) 09:45, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Dark matter, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - DVdm (talk) 09:23, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

I gave the references between </ref> and </ref>, as it was explained Saoussen.kallel (talk) 09:51, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

I see you gave references to your own work, which are just wp:primary sources. Wikipedia needs wp:secondary sources to establish notability. As soon as your work is found sufficiently interesting and is cited by others in the established literature, then perhaps someone else might mention it. See also WP:COI and WP:SELFPROMOTE. DVdm (talk) 10:15, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

February 2024

Please stop. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Dark matter, you may be blocked from editing. DVdm (talk) 10:17, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Also:

Your recent editing history at Dark matter shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - DVdm (talk) 10:17, 11 February 2024 (UTC)