User talk:Sarah.love08

Speedy deletion of The Human Bean

A tag has been placed on The Human Bean, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Deadly∀ssassin 03:10, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of The Human Bean

A tag has been placed on The Human Bean, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Thor Malmjursson (talk) 03:19, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It may not have been your intention, but a recent edit you made to The Human Bean removed a Speedy Deletion tag. If you disagree with the speedy deletion, please do not remove the tag, but place {{hangon}} underneath the csd tag on the page, then state your reasons for disagreeing with the deletion on the article's talk page. Thanks! Thor Malmjursson (talk) 03:32, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from articles that you have created yourself, as you did with The Human Bean. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:

Place {{hangon}} on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion notice(s)
Make your case on the article's talk page.

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 03:34, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note

Sarah, you've been blocked for fifteen minutes, because you weren't paying attention to efforts to communicate with you.

Please respond on this page. Thank you. DS (talk) 03:46, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sarah, sorry if you're having a tough time. I'm glad to help in any way I can, I'll watch this page if you have any questions or anything. You understand why folks thought the article wouldn't couldn't be included as it was, right? It read too much like an advertisement, which violates the very fundamental neutrality policy. I think it's going to be kept but written in a more neutral way (of course, that doesn't guarantee it won't get deleted later). Anyway, sorry for the hassle, let me know if there's anything I can do to help. Peace, delldot ∇. 03:53, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The other point is that you don't get to have another account. Use this one. DS (talk) 12:29, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Human Bean

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles or other Wikipedia pages, as you did to The Human Bean. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" is strongly discouraged. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. —EncMstr (talk) 17:04, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Human Bean

The article The Human Bean has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP is not a directory. Multiple issues including notability (2009)

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Keith 00:32, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Human Bean for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Human Bean is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Human Bean until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Skeletor3000 (talk) 21:27, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]