User talk:Sarveshjoshi42

September 2016

Hello, I'm Widr. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Pardes Mein Hai Meraa Dil without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Widr (talk) 20:32, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Pardes Mein Hai Meraa Dil, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Diffs: [1] You've removed sourced content without providing a clear explanation, and you've provided no reference for your claim that the series has been pushed to 2017. Note that we would need reliable published sources with established reputations for fact-checking and accuracy, not blogs, unverified Twitter accounts, or other user-generated sources in order to retain the information. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:15, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unconstructive edit

Re: this, you are editing against established Wikipedia guidelines, specifically WP:SLASH which discourages the introductions of slashes because they promote ambiguities, and WP:TVCAST which says explicitly "we indicate the name of the cast member and his or her noteworthy role(s), followed by a brief description of the character." By removing prose that clearly explains who the characters are and that presents context so that readers who are unfamiliar with the series can understand why there are multiple names and words in parentheses, you are making the article weaker. You are welcome to discuss the matter at Talk:Naagin (TV series), but if you choose not to, any resubmission will be considered disruptive. Since you are editing against established consensus, the burden is yours to discuss and to seek a local exception.

In case you've never seen a quality character list, here is what one looks like: List of Millennium characters#Main characters. You will note that there are many words, not just amateurish slashes and parentheses. The star that appears in the upper right of the article indicates that it is a Featured List, which is the highest level of list article on Wikipedia's quality scale. This is what we're striving for. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:03, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]