User talk:Scarecrow102

September 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Ra's al Ghul, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 13:17, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, what s/he said. You've done so many times across many articles.

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. 76.102.53.218 (talk) 19:05, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011[edit]

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to Talia al Ghul has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Wikipedia has a policy called "Wikipedia is not a crystal ball", which discourages such edits. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reference to a reliable source. Thank you.-5- (talk) 03:59, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to Talia al Ghul has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Wikipedia has a policy called "Wikipedia is not a crystal ball", which discourages such edits. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reference to a reliable source. Thank you.-5- (talk) 07:50, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to Holly Robinson (comics) has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Wikipedia has a policy called "Wikipedia is not a crystal ball", which discourages such edits. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reference to a reliable source. Thank you.-5- (talk) 16:21, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Arkham city mr freeze screen 2.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Arkham city mr freeze screen 2.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:06, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Tumblr lt2nrBxpb1qa49eto1 500.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Tumblr lt2nrBxpb1qa49eto1 500.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:05, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:1408059talia al ghul 2.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:1408059talia al ghul 2.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:06, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011[edit]

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to Talia al Ghul has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Wikipedia has a policy called "Wikipedia is not a crystal ball", which discourages such edits. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reference to a reliable source. Thank you.-5- (talk) 15:32, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to League of Assassins has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Wikipedia has a policy called "Wikipedia is not a crystal ball", which discourages such edits. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reference to a reliable source. Thank you.-5- (talk) 14:10, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011[edit]

Given the amount of warning you've gotten about this, stop adding speculation or your own opinions to articles. Information must be sourced back to a reliable, secondary source. You insistence on adding you personal opinion about fictional characters and crafte fan orient material is disruptive and can result in you being blocked if you persist in it.

- J Greb (talk) 23:09, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at your edits since this warning:

You are still adding you opinion and interpretation to articles, see Talia al Ghul, Catwoman, and Lazarus Pit. Stop. This is inappropriate for Wikipedia articles.
You have never bothered to explain an edit or to make use of the edit summary. This is essential in a collaborative effort such as Wikipedia. Others need to know what you are trying to do, especially when shifting sections in an article as with Scarecrow (comics). Without it it looks like you are randomly shuffling the text.
You are adding unneeded and unsourced trivia. Again, Stop. What you did at Joker in other media, even if sourced, is irrelevant to the article.
Stop damaging articles. You did this with the removal of sourced content from Scarecrow (comics) and the image from Mr. Freeze. And the state you left the text in on the later created an unintelligible section. The Scarecrow (comics) edit also appears to be slanting the section you removed the source from.
Wikipedia articles are not a place for extended or overly detailed plot dumps. Stop attempting to pad them out as you did with Lazarus Pit.
Wkipedia is not written in the form of a comic book. Quotes when used in an article should not be long sentences in all caps.

Continuing to disruptively edit in these or like manners will result in you being blocked.

- J Greb (talk) 23:40, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for disruptive editing and continued insistence on including plot padding based on personal interpretation, as you did at Maxwell Lord. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. J Greb (talk) 03:54, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is the same type of editing that resulted in your Dec 5th block. Continuing to add this type of plot padding and personal observation will result in you being blocked again.

- J Greb (talk) 01:47, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for continuation of editing practices previously blocked for. Wikipedia is not the place for over detailed plot summaries or personal research, theory, or commentary, as you did at Black Mask (comics). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. J Greb (talk) 13:17, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for continued editing practices that resulted in the previous blocks, as you did at Jason Todd. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. J Greb (talk) 22:44, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This also includes your tangential plot dump at Amanda Waller. - J Greb (talk) 22:44, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely[edit]

You have been evading your block with the account User:Carnival102. While you are blocked, you are not permitted to edit Wikipedia in any way. In light of your recent three blocks in succession, enough is enough. Your account(s) have been blocked indefinitely until such time as you are willing to abide by Wikipedia policies. You may appeal this block by adding {{unblock|your reason here}} below this message. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 04:07, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]