User talk:ScottRR

Welcome!

Hello, ScottRR, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Netscott 18:46, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

April 2006

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Netscott 18:46, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fatwa

Mufti is literally "an issuer of fatwa" used in all or most branches of Islam, whereas mujtahid is a special type of mufti in Shia Islam who issues fatwas based on his own understanding rather than directly using Quraan. In other words, "mufti" can be used for "mujtahid". - Eagle^(talk) 01:03, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Linkimaging on Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy

Greetings, please familiarize yourself with this 3RR report filed by User:Raphael1 before further linkimaging. Thanks! Netscott 00:22, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry on Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy

Greetings please be aware of this Request for Check User. Netscott 00:52, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Neither User:Pegasus1138 or myself are in need of a sockpuppet to avoid a block on any violation. Both User:Pegasus1138 and myself have long edit histories (more than 1000 independent edits) that are virtually independent outside of a few articles while at the time of the posting of this message, your edit history consists of less than 40 edits. Your asinine notice has been removed. Netscott 04:39, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Funny enough this lastest batch of disruptive editing on the above artilce really makes me think of this. No matter what, there is sockpuppetry going on here but this latest salvo just finally inclined me to file a report on it. Netscott 05:02, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well you can be sure that Check User will reveal who's a sockpuppet of who. If they report that the name ScottRR is not a sockpuppet of Raphael1 there's a user name or two that will almost certainly correspond to this one. Netscott 05:13, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nighty night, no need for CheckUser on this account it will be terminated shortly. We'll see you again as another sockpuppet for sure. Take it easy then! Netscott 05:16, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You can be sure I know who you are.... let's just say we've conflicted before and the same thing that resulted from our previous conflict will be the ultimate result of our conflict here. Netscott 05:21, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, the pleasure of knowing what one is talking about. HA! Netscott 08:34, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Page blanking

I don't care if you think he's a sockpuppet, don't blank his page. Just add it to the page. Stormscape 04:48, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet of Raphael101

Well CheckUser has proven that you are a sockpuppet of User:Raphael101... let's see what turns up next.... night night user account User:ScottRR. Netscott 06:18, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

LMAO. ScottRR 06:20, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]