User talk:ScrollRaider

Welcome!

Hello, ScrollRaider, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question.

I can see you're adding content related to Knowledge economy as defined by the World Bank Institute. You need to add references to the content you add, such as links to the pages where the WBI defines concepts such as Innovative System. This is required to satisfy the Verifiability content policy.

You'll also have to add an assertion of their notability to the Innovative System, David Mefford and Distributed Intelligence (Knowledge Technology) articles with references pointing to reliable sources, or those articles are likely to be deleted. Also, if you are in any way related to the World Bank Institute or David Mefford, you should disclose that relation because you'd be at risk of coming under a conflict of interest .

I hope this advice will help you to improve the content you're contributing. Again, welcome! Diego Moya (talk) 09:47, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Formatting references

Please read the references tutorial and follow it when adding sources to the content you include. You can use this webpage to create correctly formatted references according to the Manual of style for citing sources. Also be careful not to include repeated links in the article text. Cheers! Diego Moya (talk) 21:32, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Again, be careful with the formatting of references you're including. Links to external sites should use only one bracket. [www.example.com/ description] will produce description, and double brackets [[http://www.example.com/ description]] produce the incorrect [description]. Only the first appearance of a term like Intelligent Agent should be linked, and the bold typeface is reserved to the definition of the term at the first sentence in the article; terms introduced in the article body should use italics (using only two quotes ''). Diego Moya (talk) 06:18, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of several articles

Articles Distributed Intelligence (Knowledge Technology), David Mefford and Innovative System have been nominated for deletion because they lack reliable sources enough to establish their notability.

See the proposed for deletion guideline. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article explains why at each articles edit summaries in their history page.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Diego (talk) 21:39, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Status and Advice

I've removed the prod tags, for the concepts might be notable . But such jargon-laden articles as these are not really satisfactory. Please rewrite them in a more encyclopedic format, giving a wider range of references to show they are widely used concepts (quotations from the sources might be helpful) I advise you to fix the problem, and do this very quickly, before the article gets nominated for deletion by a regular deletion process. For advice in writing article here, ee our guide to writing Wikipedia articles. For more detailed information, there's the free online version of Wikipedia: The Missing Manual by John Broughton (also available in print) DGG ( talk ) 03:26, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of David Mefford

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on David Mefford, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. DGG ( talk ) 03:20, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DGG

I understand and thank you for your assistance. Additional references for the WB knowledge economy will be added. I will comply...

Proposed deletion of Innovative system

The article Innovative system has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

See Talk:Innovative system#Questions before proposal for deletion

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SchreiberBike talk 05:16, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Innovative system for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Innovative system is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Innovative system until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SchreiberBike talk 00:08, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Distributed intelligence (knowledge technology) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Distributed intelligence (knowledge technology) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Distributed intelligence (knowledge technology) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MadScientistX11 (talk) 17:14, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]