User talk:Sdcha

Hello, I'm NewAccount4Me. I noticed that you recently removed some content without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks!

Beyond this, WP:AFD discussions should never be blanked. NewAccount4Me (talk) 01:08, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NewAccount4Me (talk • contribs) 01:13, 17 August 2013 (UTC) NewAccount4Me (talk) 01:24, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm Makecat. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicholas Alahverdian, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Make cat 01:19, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Rhode Island with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Make cat 01:20, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

I have blocked you indefinitely since your only edits have been disruptive and you have made no attempt to explain them. If you believe this is unjust, you may appeal this block by following this notice with the following text: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. You are advised to read the guide to appealing blocks first, and to be prepared to show that you understand why you were blocked and undertake to avoid such behavior in the future. Zero^talk 01:45, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. GregJackP Boomer! 02:35, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts[edit]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fred newman, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. GregJackP Boomer! 02:39, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]