User talk:Sea Cucumber 17

Welcome!

Hello, Sea Cucumber 17, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 02:52, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, welcome!

Just leaving you a message to welcome you to Wikipedia. If you need help, leave me a message! ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:01, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User_talk:Oshwah, I just reported this revenge editor at AIV. They're a sock of an angry editor; see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DisgrunrledGrunt. I don't want to block them since I want them to hear from someone else. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 03:54, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Dan arndt (talk) 03:07, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Tangl

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Tangl, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Drmies (talk) 04:44, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sea Cucumber 17 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Blocked for alleged abuse of multiple accounts. Administrator blocked while case is still open. No rules were broken that I know of on my part, therefore requesting unblock. The block stemmed from a dispute on the page Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Tangl where a different administrator showed poor conduct. Sea Cucumber 17 (talk) 05:00, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Sockpuppetry confirmed by WP:Checkuser. Vanjagenije (talk) 07:45, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DisgrunrledGrunt

The SPI case is not formally closed, but is essentially finished, and a CU (Drmies) has confirmed the connection between the accounts in question. Beyond My Ken (talk) 05:56, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]