User talk:Seinfeld01

Please refrain from voting to delete an article or bio simply because you dont agree with the political philosophy. If you want to put down others for political purposes, please go move to Nigeria or another totalitarian regime. Seinfeld01 10:20, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

I hugely resent the fact that you're accusing people of partisanship on Wikipedia. In fact, I myself do not belong to any American political party, and if it was a Democrat in the exact same scenario, I would have nominated it as well. --Andy Saunders 15:37, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

This was not directed towards you Mr. Saunders -- you voted to delete simply because you dont know how to Google. It was Miss JCBarr that voted to delete because of partisan political purposes. His bio could not have been more Anti-Republican. Shame on some users of WIkipedia. --Seinfeld01 15:37, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

Anal sacculitis discussion

Please don't attack people on Wikipedia (WP:NPA), and please don't remove parts of discussions. It can be considered vandalism. --Allen 23:19, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Anal sacculitis, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, take a look at our Five Pillars. Happy editing! Kareeser|^Talk! 00:53, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

"Vulgarity"

Regarding your comment on User_talk:Jcbarr#Vulgarity, are you aware that it is official policy that Wikipedia is not censored? You can read WP:NOT#Wikipedia_is_not_censored here for the details. Remy B 17:49, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

Neutral point of view

Please take some time to review the neutral point of view policy before insisting on inserting words like "disturbed" to describe people. Friday (talk) 15:14, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Splatterball

A tag has been placed on Splatterball requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Shadowjams (talk) 02:55, 23 March 2010 (UTC)