User talk:Semanti Paul

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Edit warring[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Anushka Sharma. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --Krimuk|90 (talk) 07:44, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Your recent edits[edit]

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Button sig.png) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 08:24, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Anushka Sharma[edit]

Please stop your continous fanboy edits, I'm trying to take it to GA Status. Thanks to your edits, it now fails the "stability" criteria to become a GA. I just request you to stop editing it for a while. -- Yashthepunisher (talk) 7:17, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Anushka Sharma[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Anushka Sharma you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Semanti Paul -- Semanti Paul (talk) 05:00, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Anushka Sharma[edit]

The article Anushka Sharma you nominated as a good article has failed Symbol oppose vote.svg; see Talk:Anushka Sharma for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Semanti Paul -- Semanti Paul (talk) 03:41, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Good news!![edit]

Since you have also been involved with Anushka Sharma's article. I thought I should share this news with you that her article has passed, and is now a Good Article. It means its one of Wikipedia's decent works.(You can see the green Icon on top right of the article) Congrats to you too. -- Yashthepunisher (talk) 05:45, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 12[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of awards and nominations received by Ranbir Kapoor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rockstar. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Your recent edits[edit]

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Button sig.png) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:21, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Heyy[edit]

Hey, I just wanted to ask you about the date mentioned on Ms. Sharma's article, which says as of september 2015, she is in a relationship with kohli. But kohli confirmed about their relationship in November last year, per this earlier source. So, It might create some confusion regarding the time. What do you say? -- Yashthepunisher (talk) 06:07, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Yes, but the 'as of' thing is applicable for stuff that are bound to change real quickly, acc. to WP:CURRENTLY, so I thought maybe bringing the timeline up to date would be good? I don't know. If you want to keep the previous link, it's fine. -- Semanti Paul (talk) 10:12, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Na, Its okay. -- Yashthepunisher (talk) 12:01, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
BTW, why don't you sign your posts properly? as its explained above. -- Yashthepunisher (talk) 12:41, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
lol. There we go. -- Semanti Paul (talk) 14:38, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Now its good :) -- Yashthepunisher (talk) 15:05, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Have you seen this? [1] -- Yashthepunisher (talk) 05:15, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Yeah, I'll watch it regardless of the reviews. :) Huge RK and Imtiaz fan. How about you? -- Semanti Paul (talk) 05:42, 25 September 2015 (UTC)--
Same here. The trailer looks different, as you can expect from a Imtiaz Ali film. But I thought It would be more like Yeh Jawaani hai Deewani. Yashthepunisher (talk) 05:49, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
I watched the painful Bombay Velvet in theatre, just because of everyone involved with the film, Ranbir, Anushka and Anurag. Hope this film will break Ranbir Kapoor's string of financial failures. Yashthepunisher (talk) 05:53, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Tbh, I really don't think Bombay Velvet was THAT bad. I mean, it was average. It had its high and low points. There was a great story in it which got lost. Yes, Ranbir really needs a hit now lol. Re: Tamasha, a lot of people are saying it's like YJHD, but the last line, "Tujhe toh pyaar ho gaya hai pagli...par kisi aur se"...? I think it means that Deepika's character falls in love with the Ved in Corsica, but that is not the real Ved. Imtiaz is an intelligent director, I'm sure he'll give us something new. -- Semanti Paul (talk) 06:00, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Yes it was average, but I didn't expected an average film from Anurag Kashyap. Performance-wise, it was excellent. Tamasha, on the other hand looks quite mysterious, but I'm sure it will be worth watching. :) Maybe he has a double-role in the film and she falls in love with one of them, Who know!! Yashthepunisher (talk) 06:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Which films have you seen this year? Piku, NH10, Dil Dhadakne Do TWM Returns? Yashthepunisher (talk) 12:39, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Apart from TWMR, all of the ones you mentioned above. Also watched Badlapur, Baby, Margarita with a Straw, ABCD 2 and Bombay Velvet of course. Planning to watch TWMR, Bajrangi Bhaijaan, Bahubali and Dum Laga Ke Haisha. Drishyam also maybe. How about you? -- Semanti Paul (talk) 17:15, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
I have seen every film you mentioned except Bajrangi Bhaijan and Drishyum. Watch TWMR asap, its way better than it's first part and of course the epic Baahubali. Which one are your favourite's from this year?? Mine is every film except for Badlapur, I couldn't handle the constant misogyny. Yashthepunisher (talk) 17:35, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
BTW I'm trying to take Shreya Ghoshal to GA status. She is one of my favourite among the contemporaries. Hope it will also pass:) Yashthepunisher (talk) 17:38, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
Badlapur reminded me of Korean dramas, something I like watching. :) My favourites are Piku, Dum Laga Ke Haisha and NH10. Shreya is great, good luck with that. I am working on Ranbir Kapoor's awards, with plans for FL status. Progress is slow, however. Hardly getting the time. And I will create Bhumi Pednekar's page. She does not have one yet. -- Semanti Paul (talk) 14:36, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
Yeah everyone has there own taste.:) I'll try to help you with the list, and Bhumi Pednekar's page used to exist, but was deleted because of few editor's who thought It wasn't notable enough and didn't meet the guidelines. Good luck to you too. Yashthepunisher (talk) 15:12, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Kapoor[edit]

this interview of Ranbir Kapoor makes me feel sorry for him. Yashthepunisher (talk) 16:38, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

It's Masand. He grills so much. Ranbir will bounce back with Tamasha and Ae Dil. --Semanti Paul (talk) 19:05, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
Yeah, he interrogates celebrities with his squirrel voice. Yashthepunisher (talk) 04:15, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Box Office India[edit]

It seems like you are replacing other sources with BOI at Tamasha (film). This issue is currently being discussed at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Film/Indian_cinema_task_force#BO_of_all_BW_films. Wikipedia operates by evaluating sources as either reliable sources or not and while BoxOfficeIndia is considered a reliable source, it's considered one of many. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 04:33, 1 December 2015 (UTC) --I have checked the list of reliable sources and while Koimoi is not on the list, it is being extensively used on Tamasha (film).-- Semanti Paul (talk) 14:26, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

January 2016[edit]

Stop icon It has been found that you have been using one or more accounts abusively, have edited logged out to avoid scrutiny or have recruited friends, family or coworkers who share your point of view to support you (see the meatpuppet policy for more information). Please review the policy on acceptable alternate accounts. In short, alternate accounts or people to support you should not be used for the purposes of deceiving others into seeing more support for your position. It is not acceptable to use two accounts on the same article, or the same topic area, unless they are publically and plainly disclosed on both your and the other account's userpage.

Your other account(s) have been blocked indefinitely. This is your only warning. If you repeat this behaviour you will blocked from editing without further notice. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 00:26, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but I'm really not sure what you're talking about. I haven't engaged in sockpuppetry, and I have no other accounts. So, I don't know what 'other accounts' have been blocked indefinitely. Just letting you know. Cheers!! Semanti Paul (talk) 15:45, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Technical data shows that you are editing from the same network as WikiBriefed and you are both promoting BOI as the only acceptable source for Bollywood movies. WP:MEATPUPPETRY is not allowed in Wikipedia, and you may be blocked if you continue that behavior. Vanjagenije (talk) 20:55, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
I longer promote BOI, since it has been blocked. That was last year. and WikiBriefed and I are not the same person. Semanti Paul (talk) 04:09, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Semanti Paul (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribscreation logchange block settingsunblockfilter log)


Request reason:

I have not been conducting sockpuppetry. Wikibriefed and I are not the same person. My IP address is 14.99.110.191. I have only promoted BOI once or twice, and that too over Koimoi and not other sources. I request you to review your block. Semanti Paul talk 06:26, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Accept reason:

After conferring with several administrators and checkusers, I have decided to unblock your account. As, it appears that the account you were suspected of being connected to (WikiBriefed) was not used by yourself. Therefore, I find that the sockpuppetry block was done in error.

However, please be aware that this unblock was done with the assumption that you will edit in strict accordance with our policies from here on out... and that you will be hopefully a net positive to this encyclopedia. Please, don't let our community down by being disruptive, or by continuing to promote BOI material on our site. Remember to always use the talk pages on articles, to establish a consensus, before making any potentially contentious edits. We work as a team here to build this encyclopedia, and I hope that you will be a good addition to it.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact me at my talk page. Coffee // have a cup // beans // 11:41, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

  • Reviewing administrator comment: I'm placing this on hold pending a discussion between myself and Vanjagenije. The determination of this unblock request will be noted here as well as at UTRS (where a duplicate request has been made, with additional information provided). Coffee // have a cup // beans // 08:04, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
Thank you so much, Coffee. I will always be aware of previous discussions before introducing changes.- Semanti Paul talk 14:15, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Editors Barnstar Hires.png The Editor's Barnstar
For all the valuable edits you have been performing on Sharma's and Kapoor's article. Keep up the good work. :) Yashthepunisher (talk) 07:40, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Thanks. :) Once my exams are all over, I need to get into serious editing, not just a few here and there.

Disambiguation link notification for July 8[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anushka Sharma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Male dominance. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Crores issue[edit]

Bro before reverting lets talk in talk page. We Indians, atleast the majority of them who are ordinary people knws Indian system of crores. The billion million system will make confusion among them. Indian articles are mainly ment for indians. So why should we care about non indians?? Should use Indian system. Ambeinghari (talk) 16:27, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Haha I'm a girl unfortunately. So bro would be a wrong term. I've started a discussion on the article's talk page. and sign your posts properly. Semanti Paul (talk) 19:34, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

"Raked in"[edit]

Hi there, "raked in" is not proper encyclopedic tone for an encyclopedia. We need to avoid film industry slang (and all sorts of slang) and write in a professional, neutral tone. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:23, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svgHello, Semanti Paul. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Hii[edit]

How's life? I see you have been inactive for a while. Yashthepunisher (talk) 18:45, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Actually, I haven't been using my laptop for quite a while. And Wikipedia editing is kind of inconvenient on phone so. I do make minor edits every now and then. Let's see when I can get into major editing again. How are you? - Semanti Paul (talk) 20:49, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
I'm good. Even I haven't been editing that much since the past five-six months. Been busy. Yashthepunisher (talk) 06:49, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Scale of justice 2.svgHello, Semanti Paul. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Scale of justice 2.svgHello, Semanti Paul. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Shah jahan regency poster.jpeg[edit]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:01, 11 January 2019 (UTC)