User talk:Setia Amanah Luhur

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Setia Amanah Luhur (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

On the Sept 11 article, the section on common exclamation phrases uttered is NOT vandalism as you can check out the 911 video for yourself, there were cries of OH SHIT and OH MY GOD during the attacks and the collapse of the two towers.. What I am stating are just facts. Setia Amanah Luhur 08:20, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Decline reason:

It should have been obvious to you that the changes were inappropriate -- every time you've made these changes, you've been reverted and warned. Your edit warring is disruptive and your blatant refusal to heed the concerns of other editors is of great concern. As much as I'd like to assume good faith, you haven't given me reason at this time to believe you'd do anything other than return to edit warring. -- Luna Santin 08:23, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to September 11, 2001 attacks. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. HalfShadow 16:13, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to September 11, 2001 attacks, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. HalfShadow 16:20, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You were warned two times on other IPs, so I'll warn you one last time:

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. bibliomaniac15 01:09, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Setia Amanah Luhur (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

its been so many years

Decline reason:

I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 09:10, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Setia Amanah Luhur (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand the reasons why I have been blocked and I have decided to make amends, ie: I will make constructive and not distruptive contributions.

Decline reason:

Ok, but all this tells us is that you can spout back boilerplate text. What do you understand, why do you want to make amends, how will you make constructive edits? That's more what we're looking for here. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 22:06, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Setia Amanah Luhur (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

you SON OF A BITCH !

Decline reason:

Because you are apparently incapable of forming an unblock request, your access to this talk page has been revoked. Have a nice day. Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 03:05, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.