User talk:SevenSpheres/Archive 1

Welcome!

Hi SevenSpheresCelestia! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Sdkb (talk) 23:39, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User talk pages

Hello, SevenSpheresCelestial,

Just a reminder that editors have a wide latitude over their user pages and except for a few exceptions, they are free to delete any messages that are posted on them. Please do not edit war to post your message on another editor's talk page. If it's deleted, assume they have read it. Thanks. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:29, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I assumed that ANI notices were one of the exceptions, thanks for clarifying. SevenSpheresCelestia (talk) 03:31, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Proxima Centauri c) for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jackmcbarn (talk) 15:53, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quick note on Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests

I have moved the pages you requested, better fix the redirects and any incoming links. Cheers Megan☺️ ^{Talk to the monster} 16:22, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:03, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hello. I want to apologize for my behaviour. I'm going through really rough times in life. Feel free to delete this; I just wanted to let you know my apology. Kind regards. ExoEditor 15:48, 7 December 2020 (UTC) has given you a dove! Doves promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day happier. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a dove, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past (this fits perfectly) or a good friend. Cheers![reply]

Spread the peace of doves by adding {{subst:Peace dove}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!

Odd reversion - angry?

What do you mean (in reverting 33 Piscium) that my edit broke the page display. It's not out of the ordinary. What on earth do you mean. English is a pretty specific language given its vocabulary and you'll have to justify your destruction with regard to policy and not just your display doesn't seem to configure it right.- Adam37 Talk 22:22, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

First, I'd like to refer you to WP:NPA.

Second, your edit inserted a star chart that filled the whole page. I could have taken the time to try to fix the size of the star chart, but it was simpler to just revert your edit. SevenSpheresCelestia (talk) 22:36, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unless you are very sensitive there is no-one who would perceive any inkling of attack and none is intended. Fine I'll sort the size, and didn't really what was meant. On the contrary you can see when I do make such a sizing error I did not know and it seemed you were looking for someone whose work to destroy.- Adam37 Talk 10:15, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I did

I did "disclose these connections". User:Kepler-1229b talk

Where? SevenSpheresCelestia (talk) 19:51, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 17:45, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

SPI

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SevenSpheresCelestia, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.