User talk:Shackpoet

This user is a student editor in University_of_Alaska_Southeast/Library_Resources_and_Information_Literacy_(Spring_2018) .

Welcome!

Hello, Shackpoet, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Choosing an article to edit Editing an article • Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:40, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OAbot for students

Hello, I've replied to your question on Wikipedia talk:OABOT. Let me know how the class goes, I'm very curious! Nemo 09:43, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How did it go? :) Nemo 05:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've been revisiting the assignment since the OAbot was brought back online. There's still a lot of interpretation required to determine if the recommended link is to a legal OA copy even with good info from Sherpa Romeo. Still a very cool tool/bot and happy to keep contributing using it. Shackpoet (talk) 20:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. If this turns out to be a problem, I'd be happy to ensure that's not a problem when your students work on the tool. For example I could filter the suggestions to only include links to repositories in countries where copyright exceptions allow deposit whatever the publisher's policy is (basically Germany, Netherlands, France, Belgium, Austria). Nemo 21:06, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For example these are some of the most common archives in the queue:

   426 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr
   188 https://pure.rug.nl
   125 https://kops.uni-konstanz.de
   115 https://pure.uva.nl
   106 https://ris.utwente.nl
    94 https://comptes-rendus.academie-sciences.fr
    84 https://lirias.kuleuven.be
    74 https://repository.tudelft.nl
    71 https://orbi.uliege.be
    65 https://repository.naturalis.nl
    60 https://archimer.ifremer.fr
    59 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr
    56 https://research.vu.nl
    54 https://opus.bibliothek.uni-augsburg.de
    52 https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de
    45 https://pure.tue.nl
    44 https://epub.ub.uni-muenchen.de
    38 https://publications.goettingen-research-online.de
    34 https://hal-insu.archives-ouvertes.fr
    33 http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de

Nemo 21:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem on John Borbridge Jr

Your additions to the above article include passages copied verbatim or nearly verbatim from a non-free source. This was detected by automatic plagiarism detection software. For copyright reasons, some of your contribution was deleted and I paraphrased some. Please review the Plagiarism and Copyright training module before proceeding further. Thanks. — Diannaa (talk) 23:36, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Diannaa thanks for taking the time to cleanup after me and add some paraphrasing, I was moving too quick and intended to come back for cleanup but lost track of browser tabs! Shackpoet (talk) 00:21, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jordan Marie Daniel moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jordan Marie Daniel, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:16, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay thanks for the explanation. I'll work to track down some additional sources and appreciate the clarification about interviews (primary sources) not being sufficient sources to demonstrate notability. For consideration, I do think there are many other stub/start quality biographical articles on Wikipedia of questionable notability and source citations and a bit odd that this one gets flagged instead of those considering the coverage gaps related to Notable Indigenous People in general and women more specifically. Shackpoet (talk) 18:02, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jordan Marie Daniel has been accepted

Jordan Marie Daniel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– bradv 23:28, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You. ~~ Shackpoet (talk) 23:30, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, thanks for writing it. – bradv 23:36, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]