User talk:ShahabKhanJadoon1

Hello! You look like someone who might be interested in joining WikiProject Pakistan, and so I thought I'd drop you a line and invite you! We'd love to have you help us :-) samee converse 11:47, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Pakistan. There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much — or little — you like:

You can give your input on issues at the project's main discussion page and keep it on your watchlist: Wikipedia talk:Notice board for Pakistan-related topics.
You can add the project's to do list to your watchlist and help in what interests you.
You can !vote and work on saving articles that are up for deletion at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Pakistan.
Want to know how good our articles are? The assessment department is working on rating the quality of every Pakistan-related article on Wikipedia.
Can you code? The automation department uses automated and semi-automated methods to perform batch tasks that would be tedious to do manually.
Please participate in any of our descendant workgroups that might interest you.
Add your name in the members' list at WikiProject Pakistan members. There's also a user box template which you can put on your user page to identify yourself as a member: {{User WikiProject Pakistan}}
You may also like to add your name to List of Pakistani Wikipedians by number of edits. To opt-in, add your name here.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask me or at the Wikiproject Pakistan noticeboard, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around!

Disambiguation link notification for April 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kashmir conflict, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Asim Munir (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:34, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for continued disruption, refusal to discuss. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 21:45, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ShahabKhanJadoon1, to elaborate on the template above, your account has been blocked for continued disruption. The concerns include the persistent addition of flag icons contrary to the style manual, unsourced content, general non-constructive editing, and unwillingness to communicate. When these types of concerns are raised, communication is required. As mentioned previously, [1] you are freely permitted to blank your talk page, but as this is a consensus-based environment, you may not continue to ignore expressed policy concerns and continue a disruptive pattern of editing. Please take a moment to review the numerous messages you have blanked and let us know how you would like to move forward. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 21:56, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ShahabKhanJadoon1, note that this editing restriction has been changed to indefinite due to ongoing block evasion. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 22:27, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ShahabKhanJadoon1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello Yamaguchi Before 6 Months I'm not know about Wikipedia policy i Admit i did wrong and in further that it won't happen again on the site I hope you understand My Appeal and unblocked me. ShahabKhanJadoon1 (talk) 12:18, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have not shown that you understand the reasons for your block, namely sock puppetry and failure to communicate with other users. For the latter, I suspect the underlying reason is that you do not have the level of competency in written English necessary for contributing constructively, as you have demonstrated in this appeal. MER-C 12:34, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ShahabKhanJadoon1. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. ST47 (talk) 01:05, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]