User talk:ShaneRothko101

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

UCTGradSchoolBusiness (talk · contribs) has been paid by Rothko on behalf of University of Cape Town Graduate School of Business. Insert relevant links, such as relevant affiliations, disclosures, article drafts written by paid editors, or diffs showing paid contributions being added to articles.

Block

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 14:45, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ShaneRothko101 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Shane101 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Didn't realise poliucy about account representing organizations. Have moved to individual basis rather UCTGSB 09:45, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Procedural decline - account now unblocked for name change. Peridon (talk) 10:08, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Diannaa - was unaware of that policy but once you mentioned it, that makes sense. Have changed username accordingly.

Regard

That username is taken. Please choose another. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 20:29, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

ShaneRothko101 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

ShaneRothko101 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Shane101 username taken UCTGSB 07:06, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Allowing username change to requested username. Please put this request in at Wikipedia:Changing username as soon as possible to avoid re-blocking. PhilKnight (talk) 00:41, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning, Just hoping that the article I created which was in sandbox is in the right place to make it a draft for approval. Not sure if i've done it right. Thanks for your advice. UCTGSB 06:30, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Walter Baets (November 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Walter Baets and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 06:42, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Walter Baets (November 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Walter Baets and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 09:00, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear SwisterTwister, please advise. We were able to get the Walter Baets page up and approved a few months ago. Then it emerged that the uploader had not disclosed that it was paid-for work in uploading, so Wikipedia took it down. Now second time around, we made the correct disclosures and used the same content, except better with more references and now it doesn't make the grade? Very confusing. Would appreciate your help. I'll try and find more sources but, as I say, it was good enough once before so not sure what else to look for.

Thank you