User talk:Sharingan87

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Information.svg Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Black Cherry (album), without explaining the reason for the removal in the edit summary. Unexplained removal of content does not appear constructive, and your edit has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Thank you. - eo (talk) 21:44, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Nuvola apps important.svg Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Seventh Tree, you will be blocked from editing. - eo (talk) 21:44, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

re:Pitchfork[edit]

Just because a review is negative or differs from a majority of the other reviews is not a reason to remove it. A review is included because it is credible and professional, not because it may or may not be similar to the other links shown. - eo (talk) 22:53, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

NIN WikiProject[edit]

I'd like to invite you to join the newly-formed Nine Inch Nails WikiProject. There's alot of NIN-related articles on Wikipedia that could use a little attention, and I hope this project can help organize an effort to improve them. So please, take a look and if you like what you see, help us get this project off the ground and a few Nine Inch Nails pages into the front ranks of Wikipedia articles. Thanks! –Drewcifer (talk) 06:25, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Blender review[edit]

I've reverted your edits of Ghosts I–IV for the third time. Just because the Blender review is negative is not reason enough to remove it. Blender is far more notable then Regen (hence, Blender has an article, while Regen does not). If you feel strongly about it, please feel free to discuss it on the article's talk page. Drewcifer (talk) 00:35, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for responding. WP:Album stipulates a max of 10, simply because it's logical to put a cap on it somewhere. Otherwise there'd be way too many reviews in the infobox for some albums. I'm not exactly sure why 10 is the lucky number, but it seems reasonable to me. Other album articles do have more than 10, but that doesn't mean it's right. Drewcifer (talk) 01:02, 25 April 2008 (UTC)