User talk:Shaykh217

Maulvi Jamaluddin Sheikh moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Maulvi Jamaluddin Sheikh, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Maliner (talk) 16:11, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cowlas70

Hi - I'm Girth Summit, an administrator here. Please can you tell me what is the nature of your relationship to the account Cowlas70? Girth Summit _(blether) 09:48, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I don't know as it is not my account Shaykh217 (talk) 13:48, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I wish you had just replied to a straight question with an honest answer. Oh well. Girth Summit _(blether) 19:43, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 19:42, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shaykh217 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, I understand that I was using multiple accounts and I will not do it again or use it again, kindly review my block and unblock me, I apologize for my actions.

Decline reason:

I don't understand why you are simultaneously confessing to the use of multiple accounts below while also denying it here; the technical evidence shows some sort of coordinated edits from the same single-allocation IP range. Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:02, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please explain why you were using multiple accounts. Girth Summit _(blether) 20:45, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I stopped using Cowlas70 some time ago, the main account from which I edit is this one, I have used Cowlas70 to make a single edit in the page Kaulas Fort, that is it, other than that I had these two accounts on different devices from which I use Wikipedia. Shaykh217 (talk) 21:00, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That is not the only thing you did with the account. You're still not being honest. Girth Summit _(blether) 21:18, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly tell me so I can respond, I'm not being dishonest I am honestly confused and just kindly asking you to respond Shaykh217 (talk) 21:28, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're asking me to tell you what you did with your sockpuppet - I'm not going to disclose openly what I see in the CU data. You know what you did, whether you want to discuss it or not is down to you. I will leave it to another CU to review your unblock request. Girth Summit _(blether) 21:37, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'd appreciate if you could discuss with me what has been done using this account which has violated rules, as I have already admitted on having another account which I used but you won't tell me which rules I have violated so I can be precise in my reasoning to get unblocked. Shaykh217 (talk) 21:43, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am apologizing for doing sockpuppet and will not do it again but kindly I would like to know the actions committed. Shaykh217 (talk) 21:45, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Maulvi Jamaluddin Sheikh

Hello, Shaykh217. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Maulvi Jamaluddin Sheikh, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:10, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]