User talk:Sheena913

April 2014

Hello, I'm NeilN. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Sri Chinmoy without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! NeilN ^{talk to me} 13:31, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide third party sources that state the book defamed Chinmoy. Your assertion is not enough. Also, please read the discussion on Talk:Sri Chinmoy. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 16:10, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Sri Chinmoy shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. NeilN ^{talk to me} 16:37, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You really do need to use the talk page to discuss your changes and waiting to see what other editors say before making them as one has been reverted three times and the other has been reverted twice. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 00:57, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]