User talk:SigmaEpsilon/ArchiveFiction

Episode Naming Conventions

Courtesy note about ArbCom proceeding

Hiya, sorry to bother you, but I wanted to drop you a courtesy note to let you know about a current ArbCom proceeding where your name is briefly mentioned. If you are not familiar with ArbCom, please do not be alarmed. In real-world terms, this is sort of like stating that your name is being mentioned as one of the witnesses (or possibly even bystanders) to a case. ArbCom cases tend to be somewhat large and chaotic, but if you would like to watch the proceedings, you may wish to set Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Naming Conventions on your watchlist. Your own name is probably somewhere on the evidence page, or possibly at the workshop page. The case is currently in an "evidence-gathering" phase and has not yet reached the state of actual comment by arbitrators yet. My guess is it'll probably run for another month or so before a decision is finalized.

No action is needed on your part, this is just a courtesy note. If you would like to participate in the case though, you are more than welcome. You may wish to offer a statement with your view of events at the case's talkpage, or you can add evidence or participate in the workshop. Many editors routinely participate in ArbCom proceedings regardless of whether or not they are directly involved in the case, since ArbCom rulings are considered "binding" and may have ramifications in other parts of Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, let me know, or feel free to post at Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Naming Conventions. Best, Elonka 05:37, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Requesting comments for Lost episodes

Requesting comments for Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Lost/Episode guidelines#Name suffix - a debate over the use of disambiguation titles for episode articles of a TV show when no disambiguation is needed. Any input you wish to give would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. -- Ned Scott 21:09, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Concerning Lost-related articles (not naming conventions)

Motifs and Mythos in Lost Article

Hello. Since there are already two seperate pages Mythology of Lost and Thematic motifs of Lost, it is redunant to have the combined article. I was wondering if you'd be willing to add a {{db-author}} tag to the Motifs and Mythos in Lost article per the discussion on the Lost talk page. This would be the easiest way to delete it. Thanks. -- Wikipedical 04:17, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Paulo (Lost)

Hello there! Seeing as you edit a lot of Lost pages, I was wondering if you would support or comment on my nomiation for Paulo (Lost). Thanks, thedemonhog talk • edits • count 17:18, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Lost episodes

Hey SigmaEpsilon, I just nominated List of Lost episodes for Featured List status again and was hoping you could support or comment on the nomination at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Lost episodes. Thanks. -- Wikipedical 07:22, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Concerning Scrubs-related articles

JD scrubs cite

sorry, didn't know that, have changed it now--Jac16888 19:02, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Justin, Scrubs minor characters

hi would you be willing to comment on the Talk page for List of minor characters of Scrubs regarding your opinion on the toy unicorn Justin thanks--Jac16888 18:48, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Scrubs broadcasters

Hi, as an editor regularly involved in the editing of scrubs related articles, would you please be willing to give yours views on the discussion over the list of scrubs broadcasters, see here Talk:Scrubs (TV series)#Removal of International Broadcasters section, thank you--Jac16888 19:22, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

re Scrubs Articles

already trying to do some improvement along those lines, like the J.D. quirks section, i trimmed a fair bit off that, although, it prop could do with some more taking off. I think though that, looking at the scrubs articles, the worst one seems to be Perry Cox, which unlike the other ones which are split up into separate sections, rather than this one which is a set of relationships with other characters, which seems OK at a glance, and the rest is just a massive jumble of info in the character profile, which i intend to work on when i get round to it. right now I'm trying to sort out the scrubs episodes category wise, in fact i could use your opinion on a little thing I'm not sure about, not a dispute, I'm just not sure what to do, please see Category talk:Scrubs episodes, thanks--Jac16888 19:30, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Concering Heroes-related articles

Seven Minutes to Midnight

Sorry to revert back from you deletion of the Heroes episode description, but this was NBC's description of the episode, not speculation. True, some of it appears to describe earlier events, but we can't be sure yet that they won't be retold or revisted in this episode. Primogen 23:43, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Five Years Gone

Can I get your help at the page so i don't get in trouble for 3 reverts. Billywhack 02:28, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Other concerns

Betty Boop

I was erroniously accused of POV edits to Betty Boop. The user later apologized, and I consider the matter resolved.

There is no evidence that Betty was specifically Jewish and so your 'fictional Jews' link could be seen as being a little misleading. Please see the Betty Boop discussion page for more information on this. Thanks--Edchilvers 21:55, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Stargate Template

Isn't the whole point of the template to make it so any stargate page can acess any other stargate page? Why not put it on every page then? Plus, some other guy atached it to the tech template. Tobyk777 05:53, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

StarCraft articles

It's me, Drake. The problem with the SC articles is that they're all written in-universe and have little to no real-world info. And until someone removes most of the in-universe and provide more out-of-universe, they're still in the line of fire. AMIB is a tough man to please - if you find a way, please tell me, I've been trying for a year. The Clawed One 03:44, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

I read your response, and trust me, you couldn't be more wrong. If anything, the removal you did isn't enough. We need to drastically cut down on the in-universe info, a lot less of it, and you idea would either mean a lot more, or a bunch of stubs. The Clawed One 04:04, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Also, game guides aren't allowed, so little, preferably no gameplay info, if possible. The Clawed One 04:05, 3 July 2007 (UTC)